Skip to content

Posts tagged ‘Marian Luctkar-Flude’

Rethinking Cheating on Written Exams


The current ANS featured article is titled “Redefining Cheating on Written Exams: A Shift Toward Authentic Assessment to Promote Universal Design for Learning in the Context of Critical Caring Pedagogy” authored by Laura A. Killam, MScN, RN; Marian Luctkar-Flude, PhD, RN, CCSNE; Sara Brune, MA, RN; and Pilar Camargo-Plazas, PhD, RN. Please visit the ANS website to download this article at no cost while it is featured, and share our comments about this article here! Laura Killam shared this message about their work:

Nurse educators have a responsibility to prepare students for ethical and safe client care, which is why significant efforts are put into preserving the academic integrity in assessments. We believe that authentic open-book take-home exams are a tool that can be structured and delivered in a way that minimizes cheating possibilities. This article explores how to enact Critical Caring Pedagogy by role modeling integrity during value-based dialogue. In addition we discuss why students may cheat and how educators can design their exams in a way that prevents cheating possibilities (see Figure). We hope that this discussion stimulates discussion and debate around how to create (nearly) cheat-proof authentic exams.

A Student-Centered Approach to Authentic Written Exams

Defining Characteristics of Reviews of Literature


ANS 45:3 has just been published, and the first featured article is titled “Reviews of Literature in Nursing Research: Methodological Considerations and Defining Characteristics” authored by Amina Regina Silva, MN; Maria Itayra Padilha, PhD; Stefany Petry, MN; Vanessa Silva E Silva, PhD; Kevin Woo, PhD; Jacqueline Galica, PhD; Rosemary Wilson, PhD; and Marian Luctkar-Flude, PhD. This article is free to download while it is featured, and leave your comments here for what can be a lively discussion! Here is a message from lead author Amina Silva:

Amina Regina Silva

Literature reviews have been increasing in popularity among nurse researchers. Still, despite the availability of guidelines about the different types of reviews, the identification of the best approach is not always clear for scholars. In this paper we add to the existing literature through providing a comprehensive guide to be used by healthcare and nursing researchers while choosing among four popular types of reviews (narrative, integrative, scoping and systematic), including a descriptive discussion, philosophical underpinnings, critical analysis and decision map tree.

%d bloggers like this: