Skip to content

Posts from the ‘Journal Information’ Category

Nursing Models for the Future: Acknowledging the Political Nature of Nursing


Adeline Falk-Rafael, PhD, RN, FAAN in her guest editorial for the current issue of ANS makes a strong case for nursing models that ground practice in our own disciplinary knowledge, and makes nursing work visible and credible.  Dr. Falk-Rafael serves as a member of the ANS Advisory Board, and is a renowned nurse author/scholar whose work focuses on critical caring and social justice. She has shared these reflections on the message conveyed in her guest editorial (available here):

Version 2

Adeline Falk-Rafael

I first learned to be a nurse in a hospital “training” program in the early 1960s. During that time, I learned what nursing was in relation to medicine – what nursing care was in the context of specific medical diagnoses and treatments. Likewise, the relatively minimal attention to health promotion focused almost entirely on disease prevention. A substantial amount of the content of many of the program’s courses was delivered in the form of a physician’s lecture. Ethics was medical ethics and taught by the hospital’s priest. The nursing scope of practice was defined by employers as largely an ancillary medical service that also had some usefulness as a supplementary housekeeping service (cleaning linen and utility rooms and carbolizing the beds of discharged patients were required duties) as well as providing cheap labor in the guise of an educational experience through rotations that including several weeks of making and sterilizing infant formulas and filling individual dietary requests through short-order cooking. Little wonder that as a Registered Nurse, I had difficulty articulating what nursing was, let alone what nurses knew!

While much has changed, thankfully, in the education of nurses, I do not find that nurses practicing at point of service are much more proficient today in clearly articulating the valuable and often unique contribution they make to the health and healing of patients and populations. Because most nurses continue to be employees in bureaucratic organizations and/or large corporate structures, their scope of practice typically remains heavily influenced by prevailing medical and business models.

Nurses are still, in the words of Susan Reverby1, “ordered to care in a society that refuses to value caring.” For this reason, I am a strong apologist for nursing models. I believe they have a strong potential to strengthen nurses’ sense of identity as professionals who make a complimentary but unique contribution to health and health care. As such, nursing models can be tools of empowerment by grounding nurses solidly in disciplinary knowledge and naming aspects of nursing work, thus giving nurses language and credibility to make their work more visible. Grand theories help shape our values and belief systems about what caring for human beings means. Mid-range and micro theories provide more focused approaches to the provision of care that can and must be tested through research and linked to patient/health outcomes. To be useful, nursing models must be seen to be relevant and useful to nurses at point-of-practice, for example, as “apps” that can provide a quick resource when needed. But nursing models of the future must also have a critical perspective. They must serve as tools of resistance by assisting nurses to examine and challenge the larger societal and political forces that advantage a few while disadvantaging many others, whether those others are patients or nurses.

1Reverby S. Ordered to Care: The Dilemma of American Nursing, 1850-1945. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press: 1987.

What Would Florence Nightingale Do (WWFND)?: Nightingale and 21st Century Health Care Reform


From the Bates Center Blog:

What Would Florence Nightingale Do (WWFND)?: Nightingale and 21st Century Health Care Reform

 

 

Historical Nursing Documents Archived by City of Toronto


This update has been provided by Adeline Falk-Rafael to follow-up on the ANS article titled “Towards Justice in Health.”An Exemplar of Speaking Truth to Power.

Our article “Towards Justice in Health: An exemplar of speaking truth to power” is an analysis of 6 issues of the magazine (TJH) produced by Nurses for Social Responsibility (NSR) in Toronto, Canada, between 1992 and 1995. The article reported that the request of the magazine’s editors for archival of the magazine in the Library and Archives Canada had been denied.

A few days ago, Cathy Crowe, one of the magazine’s editors, notified us that the City of Toronto Archives has accepted both the 6 issues of the magazine and the NSR’s newsletters which predated the magazine and were alluded to in the article but were not part of the analysis. As Cathy Crowe noted, they will now be available “to aid and inspire future nurse and academic researchers on nursing and social justice.”

The vision and courage of these remarkable nurses for social responsibility is evident in some of the topics they wrote about and in which they actively sought change between 1985 and 1995. Their newsletter s and, in the later years, their magazine, covered many contentious issues that impacted health, including the environment, the sale of arms and war itself, women’s reproductive rights, health care policy, trade agreements, lesbian nurses, and needle-exchange programs, as well as issues that affected nurses in the workplace, such as working conditions and staffing mix. As we said in the article, they were exemplars in speaking truth to power and it is fortunate that the newsletters and magazines will now be available for aspiring historians and activists.

The images below of the newsletter and the magazine provide examples of the amazing topics that were addressed in this publication! Their placement in the City of Toronto archives provides a valuable resource and inspiration for nursing’s continuing social justice commitment.  For more information about Dr. Falk-Rafael’s and Dr. Bradley’s analysis of these important historical publications, see their blog message published here in August 2014.

Newsletter

Magazine

Interview with Dr. Barbara Carper


 

 

 

 

 We are delighted to publish the first “ANS General Topic” article, which is an interview with Dr Barbara A. Carper by Elizabeth R. Eisenhauer, RN, BSN, MLS.  Dr. Carper is the author of one of the most important articles published in ANS – “Fundamental Patterns of Knowing in Nursing,” published in the first issue of the journal in 1978!  Still among the most frequently cited articles in nursing, Dr Carper’s insights set in motion a major shift in nursing scholarship and practice.

Ms Eisenhauer shared this description of her experience interviewing Dr. Carper, and of her own reflections on the meaning of Dr. Carper’s ideas:

I remember being so struck by the paper “Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing” that my librarian skills immediately kicked in —What else had Barbara Carper written? Where was she? What more did she have to say? When Google provided few answers to these questions, I knew I had to seek her out. Her views about there being so much more to nursing than science are foundational; I couldn’t let it go. However, I was afraid people would think I was going off on a zany tangent, so initially, I kept the project a secret.

Eventually, I knew that I needed to discuss it on a professional level. So I confided in one of my professors, Dr. Arslanian-Engoren, at the University of Michigan. I had gotten the idea for the project while I was sitting in her advanced nursing theory development class. She was very supportive and encouraging of the project! If she had dismissed it, I am not sure I would have had the courage to pursue it so ardently. I am very grateful for her mentorship.

The “patterns of knowing” are also ways of making decisions, and this relates to my research on informed consent and decision-making among clinical research volunteers who are asked to donate biospecimens for research purposes. For example, there is a movement to collect, store, analyze, and even manipulate DNA. But DNA can alternatively be seen as more than just scientific material. It can be seen in a spiritual sense as the “essence of our individuality” [1]. Therefore, tinkering with it may have implications for some people that go beyond science and empirics. Research volunteers may not understand or consider these ethical implications, until they are explicated, weighed against volunteers’ personal values, and the consequences clearly described [2]. Helping patients or research volunteers clarify their values and make informed choices are acts of caring, fundamental to nursing [3,4]. Carper discusses the connection of veracity and transparency, during informed consent, to caring and nursing in her 1979 paper, “The ethics of caring” [3]. I fear such values are being overlooked in the modern age of blanket consent for genetic research. Again, there is so much more than science that goes into caring for and knowing a patient.

On a personal note, talking to Dr. Carper and getting to meet her was phenomenal—-a dream come true! Anyone who has had the experience of getting to meet someone they so admire will understand. I was awestruck, and she was so humble and gracious. It was an amazing, remarkable experience that I will never forget, and for which I am most grateful.

References

  1. This phrase has been used by numerous people, including Senator Pete V. Domenici in discussing the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2005. See: Weeden, JL.      Genetic liberty, Genetic property: Protecting genetic information. Ave Maria Law Review.2006; 4(2): 611-664. (Quote p.631).
  2. Tomlinson, T, Kaplowitz, SA and Faulkner, M. Do people care what’s done with their biobanked samples? IRB: Ethics & Human Research. 2014;36(4):8-15.
  3. Carper BA. The ethics of caring. Adv Nurs Sci. 1979;1(3):11-20.
  4. Dungan, JM. Dungan model of dynamic integration. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 1997;8(1);17-28.

Visit the ANS web site today to download Ms. Eisenhauer’s interview, and return here to contribute your ideas and comments to further discussion!

ANS 38:2 now published!


ANS 38:2 was released today and is available to view online!  This issuwhich focuses on the topic “Models of Care for the Future.” This issue contains two notable “firsts” for the journal, To begin, an interview with Dr Barbara Carper by Elizabeth Eisenhauer introduces our new feature: “ANS General Topics.” This issue also contains the first ANS “open access” article: “Adaptive Leadership Framework for Chronic Illness” by Dr. Ruth Anderson and her colleagues. The articles that focus on the issue topic “Models of care for the Future” cover a broad spectrum of settings and approaches to care that can inspire new ideas and possibilities. If you follow this blog, you will receive notices of our posts that feature each of the articles included in this issue over the next several weeks!  I hope you will also visit the blog frequenty, and share your comments and ideas!  We will respond!

Issue topic planned on “Toxic Stress”


We have just announced our projected issue topic on “Toxic Stress” for ANS Volume 39:4.  Manuscripts are due on April 15, 37-3 cover2016, but can be submitted at any time! Here is the description of this topic:

Toxic Stress
Vol 39:4 – December 2016
Manuscript Due Date: April 15, 2016

Toxic stress, unlike positive or tolerable stress, can result in life-long health challenges. For this issue of ANS we seek manuscripts that focus on the contributions that nurses are making to understanding the dynamics of toxic stress, and nursing approaches that demonstrate effective outcomes for children and adults suffering the effects of toxic stress. Articles that provide research outcomes, theoretic and philosophic constructions, practice models, or educational programs related to toxic stress are welcome. Implications for the development of nursing knowledge must be emphasized.

In addition, we always welcome submissions for the new “ANS General Topic” at any time!  Here is the information about this type of submission:

ANS General Topic
Manuscripts considered any time

Manuscripts submitted as “ANS General Topic” are expected to address the purposes of ANS, which are to contribute to the development of nursing science and to promote the application of emerging theories and research findings to practice.

You can see the full listing of our planned issue topics on the ANS Web site!  And our guidelines for authors can always be found here!

Sources of Inner Strength for Elderly People


Our current featured article comes to ANS from Finland authors Erika Boman, MSc, RNT; Anette H¨aggblom, PhD, RNT; Berit Lundman, PhD, RN; Bj¨orn Nygren, PhD, RNT and Regina Santamaki Fischer, PhD, RN.  Their article is titled “Inner Strength as Identified in Narratives of Elderly Women: A Focus Group Interview Study.”  While it is featured on the ANS web site, you can download your free copy of this article here!  Erika Boman has shared this message for ANS readers:

Do you study inner strength? Is that possible? Those are questions often asked when presenting the research topic of our interest. And yes, I can see what they mean. If you google on inner strength today you get 14 200 000 hits where inner strength is interpreted in almost the same amount of ways. That is why I am so happy that I have been privileged to work with members in a research group that thoroughly have studied the concept, and through meta-analysis developed a theoretical model of inner strength. In the model inner strength is conceptualized by four interacting core dimensions: connectedness, creativity, firmness and flexibility. The core dimensions have explicit definition and are more in depth described in the article, with reference to the theoretical model. Further a questionnaire was developed to measure each dimension and thereby a person’s degree of inner strength. Studies, applying the scale, have for example shown that strong inner strength is associated with better self-rated health. And through literature review inner strength has been interpreted as a health resource for experiencing well-being despite illness. 

My field of interest is related to health and quality of life among elderly women and elderly women, in general, outlive men, have impaired socio-economic and functional status, as well as report more health problems. I thought to myself – research is implying that inner strength is of importance for experiencing well-being despite illness. Identifying sources of inner strength can give health care personnel valuable information about elderly people’s capacities despite their frailty erika_johansson_2and weakness. So now there was this theoretical model defining the concept, a questionnaire to estimate a person’s degree of inner strength, as well as literature suggesting that inner strength is a health resource of importance. But, is it always applicable in nursing to use a questionnaire to estimate a person’s inner strength? What about criticism to nursing science being to theoretical? Is there some way we can enlighten how inner strength can be expressed in everyday conversations implementing the theoretical model? The aim of this study was therefor to explore how inner strength and its dimensions, as described in a theoretical model, can be identified in the narratives of elderly women. Focus group interviews where made with 29 women between the age of 66 and 84. Inner strength was identified in there narratives of the elderly women as a strive to be in communion, to make the best out of the situation, having a mind-set that it is all up to you, and considering life as a balancing act. Further descriptions are found in the article, where also possible application of the theoretical model in relation to previous research is discussed. The study is considered to add nuance to the notion of inner strength and deepen empirical knowledge about the concept. Finally, we hope that this study can be a contribution to narrowing theory to practice.

Please join the conversation to explore the ideas presented here and in the article!  Share your comments here, and we will respond!

 

Editorial messages: Contexts and Patterns of Health Behavior


The current issue of ANS has three important editorial messages that ANS readers will not want to miss.  My own editorial, titled “Editorial Standards of Quality: Examining Patterns of Health in Scholarly Publishing,” is part of the International Academy of Nursing Editor’s initiative focused on exposing the practices of predatory publishers, and affirming the high editorial standards that characterize credible and reliable journals.  If you have not yet examined this important issue, read this editorial and the resources that I reference in it.  You can also refer to my recent blog addressing the broad topic of open access publishing, a credible publishing model founded on the intent to make scientific research freely available to all. However digital open access publishing has also opened the door to editorial practices by some that compromise editorial standards, and it is incumbent on all scholars to be fully informed about these practices in order to distinguish which practices are sound and which are not.

Dr. Mickey Eliason, a leading scholar in the area of LGBT health, examines the influence of neoliberalism in shaping health behavior in her guest editorial titled “Neoliberalism and Health.”  Dr. Eliason focuses on the neoliberal ideal of individualism and examines how this ideal creates the tendency to overlook contextual, upstream factors that shape patterns of health behavior.  Essentially, Dr. Eliason takes a critical look at the upstream factors that shape patterns of scholarship, and how earthresearchers can resist the tendency to study individual factors without adequately integrating contextual factors.

Dr. Richard Cowling has also contributed a guest editorial to this issue titled “Contextualizing Patterns of Health Behavior: A Unitary-Emancipatory-Transformative Perspective.” Dr. Cowling also addresses the necessity of contextualizing health behavior in the quest to reach for wholeness. He explains that wholeness can only be fully appreciated from a perspective that fully integrates the contexts in which human behavior occurs.

All of these editorials are available at no cost on the ANS web site.  Visit the web site now to download your copy, and return here to share your own perspectives and ideas.

ANS Volume 38:1 Just Released! Patterns of Health Behavior


Patterns of health behavior, the topic of this issue of ANS, are at the heart of nursing’s concern. In this issue you will find 38-1 coverthought-provoking articles that address specific health behaviors that constitute human responses to health challenges. Several of these articles provide insights that expand understanding of human responses, and evidence that inform nursing practice. Watch the ANS web site and blog over the coming weeks as we feature each of these articles, with messages from the authors about their work.

Visit the ANS web site now!  Here is what you will find in this new issue!

Guest Editorial by Mickey Eliason – Neoliberalism and Health

Guest Editorial by Richard Cowling –Contextualizing Patterns of Health Behavior: A Unitary-Emancipatory-Transformative Perspective

Erika Boman, Anette H¨aggblom, Berit Lundman, Bj¨orn Nygren and Regina Santamaki FischerInner strength as identified in narratives of elderly women: A focus group interview study

Sadie P. Hutson, Joanne M. Hall and Frankie L. Pack – Survivor Guilt: Analyzing the Concept and its Contexts

Shawn M. Kneipp and Linda Beeber – Social Withdrawal as a Self-Management Behavior for Migraine: Implications for Depression Comorbidity Among Disadvantaged Women

Ingrid Ruud Knutsen – A Discursive Look at Large Bodies—Implications for Discursive Approaches in Nursing and Health Research

Deborah Christensen – The Health Change Trajectory Model An Integrated Model of Health Change

Open Access: What it is and what it is not


The recent rapid explosion of online publishing and the parallel emergence of “open access” publishing has created a huge challenge – and heaps of confusion – for publishers, editors, and authors in all scientific disciplines, nursing included!  To add to the confusion, there is now an abundance of shady practices that affect anyone who engages in scholarly and academic work coming ebookwormfrom  “predatory” publishers. In this post I will explain basic facts about the concept of “open access” in journal publishing.

First, here is a brief description of terms often confused with “open access” with explanations particularly related to ANS

Open Access refers to a business model that requires an article processing charge (APC) to cover the cost of publication and to retain the copyright, in place of the traditional subscription fees that readers pay for access to the copyright-protected content of the journal. This is known as the “gold” open access model. Open Access journals or articles are financially possible because the author has paid the cost of publishing, making the content available to anyone without a subscription fee. The author holds the copyright and can use and distribute the published article as they wish.  This model emerged because of the worthy intent that scientific findings need to be readily and easily accessible for other scientists to build on, and for the public benefit without the barrier of subscription fees. Occasionally publishers will use what is known as a “green” open access model; they do not require the “gold” APC, but they give a “green light” to an author to self-archive their pre-publication manuscript in an open repository. ANS is now a “hybrid” journal, meaning that it remains a traditional subscription journal with the “gold open access” option for the author, meaning that after their manuscript is accepted for publication, the author can pay an Article Processing Charge (APC) to retain copyright of their article and to make their published article immediately and permanently available to the public.  The APC for an ANS article is currently $2500 USD.

Public Access refers to a requirement of a funding agency stipulating that funded research results be made available to the public regardless of who holds the copyright, usually after an embargo period. If the content is published in an open access journal, the funding agency or other institutional support may cover the APC.  If the journal is a traditional subscription journal, there are guidelines that publishers and funding agencies follow that stipulate certain embargo requirements, meaning the content is only made available to the public several months (usually 6 to 12) after the publication date of the journal. The ANS publisher (Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins) complies fully with the requirements of funding agencies to provide public access of all material published in ANS that is based on research the agency funded.

Free Access refers to voluntary release of selected copyright-restricted content to the public as a marketing tool, or as a service to the profession.  ANS provides free access for about a two week period for articles that appear in our current issue, with the current featured articles listed on the ANS home page. Free access content is subject to the restriction of copyright – the fact that it is free does not mean that you can freely share articles you download for free!  If you follow this blog, you already know that we feature each of the articles here on the blog, with messages from the authors, during the time that they are available for free access.

Pay to Publish is a relatively new term that refers to the practice of using Article Processing Charges (APCs) for personal gain – also known as predatory publishing. Predatory “pay to publish” practices side-step the standards of editorial integrity that assure sound content, and that assure permanent discoverability of the content.

Legitimate open access publications maintain strict adherence to editorial standards of integrity that assure the value and worth of the content of the journal.  If a publication is “open access” it does not mean that it is published more rapidly than traditional print journals, and in fact adequate editorial and peer review takes time regardless of the business model used to sustain the publication. There is a relatively minor time efficiency involved in digital publishing, regardless of the business model used to support the publication.  For example, open access journals published online are not restricted by print deadlines and release dates. Journals that are essentially subscription journals will release selected content online ahead of print and will provide free access for the “early view” articles until the publication release date.

The International Academy of Nursing Editors (INANE) has recently launched an initiative to inform all readers of nursing journals about the pitfalls of predatory practices, and to assure our readers of the standards of publishing integrity that we uphold in our journals. We launched this initiative with the publication of a collaborative statement – Predatory Publishing: What Editors Need to Know – available now in the “Nurse Author & Editor” newsletter – you can register on the site for free access to the newsletters!  An ANS editorial related to this project will appear in the next issue, (Volume 38:1, January – March 2015) – so watch for this coming soon!

Do you have questions or comments to share?  Share your thoughts here!